Job_Reviews

What the
readers say.

Job Reviews is the short form on every active job page. Service design professionals rate how clearly the description is written, how open it is about pay and scope, and whether they would apply. Signed-in members see the averages on the job page, where employers and candidates see the same numbers. This page covers what gets collected, who can review, and where the numbers can mislead.

The Form

What it shows

Below the description on every active job page sits the review form. It asks whether you would apply, what stands out, and how well the description is written. Filling it in takes about 30 seconds and requires a free registered account, with one review per listing per account.

From the first review on, a Community review card joins the form: the counts and averages from everyone who reviewed that listing, updated as new reviews arrive. The card appears for signed-in members; guests see an invitation to create a free account.

Rating dimensions

Clarity

Is the role clearly defined?

1 Vague · 5 Crystal clear

Transparency

Is salary, seniority, and scope openly stated?

1 Opaque · 5 Fully open

Alignment

Is this genuinely a Service Design role?

1 Not really · 5 Absolutely

What appeals to you?

Offered after a Yes on the apply question.

Salary statedClear responsibilitiesSeniority fits titleGenuinely service designRealistic expectationsSpecific, not genericTeam contextOther

What gives you hesitation?

Offered after Maybe or No.

No salary listedVague responsibilitiesWrong seniorityNot design-focusedUnrealistic expectationsGeneric descriptionMissing team contextOther

Community review card

Reviews

How many people have reviewed the listing.

Would apply

The share of reviewers who answered Yes on the apply question.

Clarity average

The mean clarity score, out of 5.

Transparency average

The mean transparency score, out of 5.

Alignment average

The mean alignment score, out of 5.

Top strengths

The three appeal picks chosen most often.

Top hesitations

The three hesitation picks chosen most often.

Provenance

Where the data comes from

Every number comes from a reader who filled the form on that job page, and the averages are computed from those forms. The X-Ray panels on the same pages are filled by automated extraction. Reviews are written by people, one at a time.

Reviews are tied to your registered account, which is how the site limits each account to one review per listing. The server accepts at most three submissions per hour from the same account, failed attempts included. Reviews are only ever shown as community averages, never attributed to you.

Reviews are open while a listing is active and for 30 days after it expires. Filled and archived listings stop accepting them.

The community card appears for signed-in members with the first review, and the averages update as new ones arrive.

Honest Limits

What it does not do

The scores describe the job description, not the job. A listing can read well and still add up to a rough role, and nobody at the company has to agree with the ratings.

Reviewers are self-selected: people who opened the listing and decided to rate it. The scores carry that bias.

Small samples swing. With a handful of reviews one person moves an average.

Posting a review still requires no proof that the reviewer read the whole description, applied, or worked in the role.

Employers see the same public job page as everyone else. Reviews are a public signal, not a private feedback channel, and nothing is sent to the employer directly.

The optional suggestion box is stored but not published on the job page. The disclaimer covers the rest.

Try It